Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 06:18
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
The Action Network: Cracker Barrel 400 predictions, picks, odds for Nashville - NASCAR.com
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why do black people prefer thick, curvy women?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
With a housing crisis going on, should we make owning properties illegal?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
June 21 Is Suddenly a Big Day for Borderlands 4 - Game Rant
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why do old men think young women and girls would want them over guys their own age?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years: